Structure of international politics during the Cold War bipolar system of the United States and the Soviet Union as an axis. The same mechanics smile narrowly defined as hostile relationship the other hand, China has opened up a variety of possibilities to the third country. Flexible balanced bipolar system, the US-China relationship as defined. During the Cold War, the US-China actually has been
And they claim that war is necessary for defending these values. But this claim is contradictory to their actions. In the months prior to the terrorist attacks, the US had already walked away from several international treaties, including the Kyoto climate accord and an agreement to eliminate land mines.
These contradictory actions against to US idealism and moralism show the hegemony to streng
and interaction of the state in unit level. Neo-realists think that cause of war is due to the features in the structure of international system, yet classical realists analyze as human nature, which is rational and selfish. Moreover, neo-realists see the interest of state as security within the anarchic system. However, classical realists focus on security of national state through accumulation
and direct leadership toward East Asia-Pacific Region for larger interest.
2) Bush Administration
In company with the post-Cold War, US established the basic policy objectives toward Northeast Asia and they are like the conversion from a lean-to-one-side policy to the policy which guard against Russia, maintenance of US-Japan cooperative system, the provision for China, stable control of Ko
and technology to maintain their growth. These efforts have been successfully going on and this is crucial for china’s future development as well. In addition, China is continuously catching up the United States’ economy which is a current hegemonic leader. In political sense, since beginning of an open economy, China has been expanding their international relations through export-oriented po